Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:06
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Draisaitl says Perry rallied Oilers: 'When he speaks up, you listen' - theScore.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
I can't stop thinking about this plotline in 'Materialists' - NPR
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
With 'I Love Lucy' and beyond, Desi Arnaz helped shaped TV as we know it - NPR
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How do introverts celebrate their birthday?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Youth overdoses from synthetic opioids are increasing. What parents should know - CNN
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.